Posted by Jo on November 21, 1997 at 02:06:28:
In Reply to: response to heat posted by soldier#1 on November 19, 1997 at 10:45:40:
: after some heated e-mail, i decided to go back and look at my posting from last night. what i found was that the second part of my message- specifically, an explanation for the tongue in cheek content and also a conspiracy theory of mine comparing the canoe
: chase to the Princess Di death, well, for some reason it wasn't included in the original text. this of course changed the ENTIRE CONTEXT of the message, rendering me as evil and psychotic. although i plead guilty to the latter, as for the former, i plead innocent. perhaps its length caused a problem. anyway, since i never really checked it until just now, i had no idea that only half of my ramblings were posted.
: I never intended to dis anyone or anything connected to the film. due to its importance in my past, it would be unfathomable for me to do so. i respect the film and those, including me, who have been affected by it. I'm sorry if I offended anyone. it was purely unintenional. I am completely embarrassed.
I must admit, when I read your post that night, I figured I was up way to late to be reading anything...if this is a mistake in your life , be thankful that you can apologize and move on. It must have been the full moon that night.
I, too, like your second family here, wait on your next installment.
(Was there really no book of "how it was made" published?)
Post a Followup