Posted by Marcia on August 03, 1998 at 10:59:55:
In Reply to: Re: Did a wee bit of brogue slip through? posted by ann on August 03, 1998 at 09:09:52:
: Thanks Kathy, for the interesting comments. I find Mann's remarks fascinating but a little disppointing re "Historical accuracy in and of itself is boring." .....history buffs would never agree with that opinion.....amazing that he took the time & trouble to be such a stickler then when it came to detailed aspects of the fort, costume, languages. To me, all the historical integrity displayed in the film make it so unique. Anyone can change history to suit their dramatic impact needs, but it takes a truly talented person to use the facts of antiquity and give them the aura they deserve........according to my lights anyway......ann
Ann, I feel sure Michael Mann meant that dry historical accuracy (the facts, figures, dates we had to learn in school) need to be presented in a way that brings them to life. In order for us to be entertained by them (and not bored), we need to see history as it was LIVED and not as a catalog of data presented alone. Thus, the importance of giving us people to care about and a storyline that draws us in to the era portrayed. He would never diminish the importance of historical accuracy, obviously, or he wouldn't have bothered with all the details that make LOTM so realistic.
Post a Followup