The Mohican Board! [Bumppo's Redux!]
The Mohican Board! [Bumppo's Redux!]
3/29/2024 9:56:10 AM
On the Trail...Home | Old Mohican Board Archives | Purpose
Events | Polls | Photos | Classifieds | Downloads
Profile | Register | Members | Private Messages
Search | Posting Tips | FAQ | Web Links | Mohican Chat | Blogs
Forum Bookmarks | Unanswered Posts | Preview Topic Photos | Active Topics
Invite a Friend to the Mohican Board | Guestbook | Greeting Cards | Auction (0) | Colonial Recipe Book
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 AGAINST ALL ODDS MESSAGE BOARD - Mohicans Version
 Any Other Military Encounters - 1492 - Present
 Nuking Japan...
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic

Author Previous Topic: A late thanks to all veterans Topic Next Topic: King Philips War 1675/6  

Obediah
Mohicanland Statesman


Skull 5
USA



Bumppo's Patron since [at least]:
August 16 2006

Status: offline

Donating Member

Posted - April 13 2007 :  12:29:54 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Serious questions time...instead of dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima & Nagasaki, why didn't the US cut to the chase & nuke Tokyo? The USAF could have dropped it right on top of the Imperial Palace. Which brings me to my other question: even while the US was fire-bombing Tokyo back to the stone age, why did they always spare the Imperial Palace and Hirohito? I assume FDR/Truman/et al thought they had a good reason for what they did or didn't do, but I don't have a clue what that was. Any WWII experts in this forum who can give us some wisdom here?
report to moderator

lonewolf
Colonial Settler

Lonewolf



Bumppo's Patron since [at least]:
February 12 2004

Status: offline

 

Posted - April 13 2007 :  7:41:41 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote  Copy this URL to Link to this Reply
FDR and Truman both knew that Hirohito would be needed to unite Japan at the conclusion of World War Two. So did Gen. MacArthur. A civil war would have ensued following the surrender of Japan, if Hirohito would have been hanged or killed by bombing. We made the correct decision, based on what we were facing, even though Hirohito deserved to have been hanged. He never had power sfter WW2, but was only a figurehead. Thus, he was spared. There was enough evidence to put him on trial and hang him. He could easily have been tried as a war criminal. Sometimes tough decision have to be made for the overall good. There was no question that he was involved in WW2 decision making, and even in instigating and, going along with the military leaders in the warmaking process. The attrocities committed by Japan against millions of Chinese civilians alone, was enough to hang Hirohito as a war criminal.

As far as nuking Tokyo, there wasn't much sense to it, since we already burned it to the ground with fire bombs. Nuking Tokyo would have been a waste of a nuke. We actually killed more Japanese in Tokyo using firebombs than we did with nukes in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.
There is a lot of controversy over the U.s. using nukes, but the Japanese left us no choice. A land war in Japan would have cost the U.S. and Japan many times the numbers killed in the dropping of the two nukes.
War is pure hell, and there really are no winners in war, just losers all the way around. War is inhumane and should be avoided at all costs.
Glory in war? It brings out both the best and the worst in humans.

We only had two nukes available, so they had to be dropped on carefully selected industrial targets. Hiroshima and Nagasaki fit the bill.

When we firebombed Dresden and Hamburg in Germany, those were psychological targets designed to break the spirit of the German populace. This they failed to do, but we reduced the skilled work force by hundreds of thousands. Sadly, innocent children die in wars.

Ken Lonewolf
report to moderator Go to Top of Page

Obediah
Mohicanland Statesman


Skull 5
USA



Bumppo's Patron since [at least]:
August 16 2006

Status: offline

Donating Member

Posted - April 13 2007 :  11:39:46 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote  Copy this URL to Link to this Reply
quote:
Originally posted by lonewolf

... There is a lot of controversy over the U.s. using nukes, ...

There may be controversy for using nukes now, but there was absolutely NO controversy back in 1945. But you already knew that...

BTW, thanks for the info. It cleared up what I thought I knew.
report to moderator Go to Top of Page

Dances with Beagles
Colonial Settler

USA



Bumppo's Patron since [at least]:
May 19 2002

Status: offline

Donating Member

Posted - April 14 2007 :  1:32:35 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote  Copy this URL to Link to this Reply
I'm not expert on this at all, but my understanding is that part of the reason Hiroshima was chosen was because it was relatively intact from the war, and bomb blast studies could be done to see the impact of the atomic bomb. If they picked an already-bombed-out city, it would be hard to assess what the bomb did.
report to moderator Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic: A late thanks to all veterans Topic Next Topic: King Philips War 1675/6  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
| More
Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:
 

Around The Site:
~ What's New? ~
Pathfinding | Mohican Gatherings | Mohican Musings | LOTM Script | History | Musical Musings | Storefronts on the Frontier
Off the Beaten Trail | Links
Of Special Interest:
The Eric Schweig Gallery | From the Ramparts | The Listening Room | Against All Odds | The Video Clips Index

DISCLAIMER
Tune, 40, used by permission - composed by Ron Clarke

Custom Search

The Mohican Board! [Bumppo's Redux!] © 1997-2024 - Mohican Press Go To Top Of Page
Current Mohicanland page raised in 0.25 seconds Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07